Posts tagged ‘Racist’

Pennsylvania’s Bad Election Law –

Pennsylvania’s Bad Election Law –

On Thursday, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments about the state’s strict new photo ID law, which is allegedly intended to prevent voter fraud. A voter must present a government-issued or other approved photo ID at a polling place to vote or can file a provisional ballot, which must be validated later by a submission of a photo ID or proof that the voter is indigent.

A Tight Election May Be Tangled in Legal Battles (September 10, 2012)
Pennsylvania Judge Keeps Voter ID Law Intact on Its Way to Higher Court (August 16, 2012)

Opinion Twitter Logo.
Connect With Us on Twitter

For Op-Ed, follow @nytopinion and to hear from the editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, follow @andyrNYT.

The state has offered no evidence of voter identity fraud to justify this law. There is no legitimate government interest that justifies the burden the law imposes on voters. If the court does not block the law, it will cause irreparable harm. In Philadelphia, for instance, almost one-fifth of the registered voters may not have an acceptable form of identification to vote on Election Day. Statewide, almost one-tenth may not.

When he signed the law in March, Gov. Tom Corbett claimed that it “sets a simple and clear standard to protect the integrity of our elections.” But, at a meeting of the Republican State Committee in June, the House majority leader, Mike Turzai, boasted that it would “allow Governor Romney to win the State of Pennsylvania.”

A state trial judge, Robert Simpson, last month rejected a motion by voters and civic groups to prevent the law from going into effect. They argued that the ID requirement would strip away the fundamental right to vote, particularly for disadvantaged groups.

Judge Simpson, however, said he was obliged to follow a 2008 United States Supreme Court case, which upheld an Indiana voter ID law. But, in that case, the court was applying the United States Constitution to a less stringent Indiana law. In this case, the Pennsylvania law is far more burdensome on voters and the State Constitution is arguably even more protective of voting rights. In fact, this case is more similar to ones in Missouri and Wisconsin where state courts, applying state constitutions, struck down photo ID laws.

The law will result in disproportionate harm to minorities, people with low incomes and senior citizens. The court should enter an injunction against it before the November elections.


TV Host Jim Cramer Says Father Will Not Be Allowed To Vote Because Of Pennsylvania Voter ID Law

TV Host Jim Cramer Says Father Will Not Be Allowed To Vote Because Of Pennsylvania Voter ID Law.

Jim Cramer, the host of CNBC’s finance program Mad Money, is seeing the effects of voter suppression laws firsthand.

This morning, Cramer tweeted about his father, a Pennsylvania resident who stands to lose his right to vote because of the state’s new restrictive voter ID law. Like thousands of Pennsylvania who could be disenfranchised in November, Cramer’s father lacks a voter ID because he’s a senior citizen and does not drive. Cramer also noted that he doesn’t have access to his citizenship documents.

Arizona’s SB1070 ‘Show Me Your Papers’ Provision Likely to Go Into Effect – COLORLINES

Arizona’s SB1070 ‘Show Me Your Papers’ Provision Likely to Go Into Effect – COLORLINES.

On Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton virtually cleared the way for Arizona to start questioning suspected undocumented immigrants they come in contact with. Bolton gave the U.S. Department of Justice and Arizona 10-days to work out the wording of the order that will officially lift a 2-year-old injunction that prevented officers from checking a person’s immigration status.

“The district court was correct in blocking Arizona’s harboring statute, which criminalized many everyday interactions with unauthorized immigrants. Unfortunately, the district court’s ruling let the “show me your papers” law stand, despite significant new evidence that it was passed with a discriminatory motive and will result in illegal detentions,” said Cecillia Wang, director of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project “The ruling puts an enormous burden on the countless Arizona residents who will be victims of racial profiling and illegal detentions because of this law. We remain committed to fighting what is left of SB 1070 and defending the rights of all Arizonans to be free from this unjust law.”

Supporters of SB 1070, including Gov. Jan Brewer, cheered the ruling.

“After more than two years of legal challenges, it is time that Section 2B of SB 1070 take effect,” Brewer said in a statement. “Given today’s ruling, along with the federal court’s suggestion that it intends in the very near future to formally lift the existing injunction, it is clear the day of implementation is fast approaching.”

There is some good news to come out of all this. Judge Bolton issued an injunction against a statute that makes it a crime to harbor people suspected of being undocumented immigrants.

The Real Goal of Ariz.’s Book Banning Thought Police: Harass Latinos – COLORLINES


On Jan. 1, Arizona’s ban on the Mexican American Studies curriculum used in Tucson high schools went into effect. The weeks since have been marked by confusion and backtracking as the district leaders and teachers scramble to comply with the state law. The fight is far from over, though, with a federal lawsuit pending and ongoing organizing taking place.

Initially, the Tucson Unified School District Board of Education seemed poised to refuse compliance. But it quickly caved when State Superintendent John Huppenthal, who thought up this whole thing, slapped the district with a $4.9 million penalty by cutting its state funding retroactively to last August.

How do you get rid of a program that has, by all educational standards, been successful for more than a decade? Apparently, the first step is to strip that curriculum of the material that gives it heft. This week, the district began removing seven books from MAS classrooms, which were boxed up and stored in a warehouse where books go to die. That list includes “Occupied America: A History of Chicanos,” Paulo Freire’s “Pedagogy of the Oppressed,” “Rethinking Columbus,” “Critical Race Theory,” Shakespeare’s “The Tempest” and “Chicano!: the History of the Mexican American Civil Rights Movement.”

The removal is to be thorough—teachers are not allowed to keep even personal copies of these books in their classrooms. Students and teachers described their fear and heartbreak at an emotional community meeting over the past weekend.

It isn’t just the books but also the context in which they are being taught that is problematic for the district. As the list has made its way around the country, the district immediately objected to accusations of banning books. In a statement, the district said that it had not banned the books, but simply removed them from classes that had been banned. The books could still be found in other classrooms across the district, and in its libraries.

Jeff Biggers, who has done excellent, consistent journalism on this issue, reported the following availability: two copies of “Pedagogy of the Oppressed,” one copy of “Critical Race Theory” in the online catalog and of 16 in-district copies of “Rethinking Columbus,” none are in Tucson High School, the home of the Mexican American Studies curriculum. So these books can still be read and taught, says the district, just not in the context of Mexican American Studies and racial politics.

That is the problem, for instance, with “The Tempest,” Shakespeare’s play about colonialism and slavery. Teacher Curtis Acosta, who designed much of the banned curriculum and led its implementation, recorded a meeting with district administrators last Wednesday. Everyone is clearly confused, and trying to protect the district. So administrators tell Acosta in the meeting that it would be best not to teach “The Tempest” using the “nexus of race, class and oppression” or “issues of critical race theory.”

In an interview with Biggers, Acosta notes that he was told to avoid texts and lessons with race or oppression as central themes. He further notes that there may be penalties if students independently address these themes: “We also have not received confirmation that the ideas, dialogue, and class work of our students will be protected…. if I avoid discussing such themes in class, yet the students see the themes and decide to write, discuss or ask questions in class, we may also be found to be in violation.”

Three things strike me about this situation.

First, I’m impressed with the rigor of this curriculum. I have read most of these books, and the “Critical Race Theory” anthology is challenging even for me, with 25 years of such theory and a lot of practice under my belt. No wonder this program raised grades and graduation rates so successfully.

Second, I think of books as living entities that come alive when a reader engages them. It hurts me to think of lonely books stuck in storage.

Finally, and most importantly, I understand that in this process, the state and the district will come up with all kinds of maneuvers to replace this curriculum against the will of the teachers, administrators, students and parents who have benefitted in myriad ways from its existence. The powers that be will constantly make and unmake regulations because there is no easy way to do this. All that inconsistency will make no difference to the Hornes and Huppenthals and Brewers who put it in place, because their objective has already been met—to put the Mexican American community on the defensive by reinforcing its un-American image, and to prevent any progressive discussion of racial politics in the state. They aren’t opposed to racial politics, just to a brand that counters their own.

When I was in Tucson last fall with the CultureStrike delegation, I toured historic South Tucson with Salomon Baldenegro, a local civil rights hero who is featured in “Chicano!”. Baldenegro, now in his 60s, told us he was an early reader and fluent English speaker, but when he started school, all kids of Mexican descent, no matter how deep their roots in Arizona, were put into Americanization programs where they “learned” English and American games. When Baldenegro’s mom registered him for school, the principal tested his reading. The little boy read out loud a book for first graders, then one for second graders and then one for third graders. The principal accused him of having memorized all the books and refused to put him in the proper class for his level. Some 60 years later, the state of Arizona, having had to desegregate its schools, has come up with a new way to Americanize Mexican Americans.

The state will fail, just as they did with Baldenegro’s generation. Tucson activists, while understandably angry and disappointed, project an optimism that we often don’t expect from people who have been so put upon for so long, and they are far from giving up. But they can’t protect their right to knowledge alone. The rest of us need to back them up, by following their fight, by talking to our own friends and neighbors about it, and by taking action when we are asked.

Comments for this page are closed.

Showing 9 comments

  • urbanskin

    It should be mentioned that numerous Native authors were “banned” as well.  Sherman Alexie, Suzan Harjo, Winona LaDuke, Leslie Marmon Silko, Buffy Sainte Marie.  Focusing on only one aspect of what was banned alienates potential allies.  There is need to unify our joint struggles.

  • kristina29

    Wow. I didn’t think Arizona couldn’t possibly get anymore ridiculous. I stand corrected.

  • 36stmexican

    The Mexican American Studies teachers have comitted the crime of memory.Remembering our history is frightening to some people. The Mas teachers have comitted the crime of demonstrating that our youth can learn.Remember history,when it was a crime to teach a slave to read?Our youth can learn and will pay attention to teachers without suspension,expulsion,detention,or punishment for speaking Spanish.When is it a crime to teach in a way that captures the attention of our young people?Educators of color are punished for suceeding where others fail.Generating power with and for our community is the offense.Demonstrating that power with can fly while power over can’t even leave the runway has to be unlawful in the state of Arizona.

  • mkspence

    Is there any reason why TUSD can’t bring their Mexican American Studies curriculum in compliance with state law in the same manner as Phoenix, Yuma, Nogales, and Flagstaff?

  • floreswriter

    Why would TUSD post the ban on their website? Because they won’t define this act as a ban on those books.

  • Allboutenergy

    The more things change, the
    more things stay the same.  I had the
    pleasure of owning a small restaurant in the copper mining town of Bisbee, AZ
    (4 miles from the Mexican border) in the early ’70s.  Every morning the superintendent of the local
    school district would come in for his morning coffee and doughnut.  He’d sit at the counter and I enjoyed
    chatting with him about local gossip and education.  I mentioned on one of these morning visits
    that I had substitute taught in an 8th grade English class the past week and
    found some of the students from Spanish speaking homes, which accounted for
    nearly half the Bisbee population, could not speak English well enough to even
    understand their homework assignments.  I
    suggested what has since come to be referred to as an “English as a Second
    Language” curriculum, to give them a leg up, as it were.  He responded by asking, “Why should we
    do that; we were here first.  Let them
    learn English on their own.”  This
    from the superintendent of the public schools!
    I suggested he study up on the local history and to look up the Gadsden
    Purchase in particular.  He never again
    set foot in my restaurant nor was I called to substitute teach in a Bisbee
    school ever again.

  • mkspence

    I’m sorry, but I have looked at the Tuscon Unified School District web page about this issue, and nowhere do I see a mention of a “book ban”…

  • Of course they wouldn’t mentioned “book ban.” Those are dangerous and correct words. They will use misleading labels so people won’t realize what they are doing until it is too late.

  • C_Tom_J

    “All MAS (Mexican-American Studies) courses and teaching activities, regardless of the budget line from which they are funded, shall be suspended immediately”.

    “The district shall revise its social studies core curriculum to increase its coverage of
    Mexican-American history and culture, including a balanced presentation of diverse viewpoints on controversial issues. The end result shall be a single common social studies core sequence through which all high school students are exposed to diverse viewpoints.”

    Part of this process is the purging of books that bring subversive viewpoints about the history and origins of the US. That means banning books so they can “revise” their curriculum. It’s pretty obvious, it’s not like you have to read between the lines to see what they’re doing. Whether or not you can find the words “book ban” in the text when you hit ctrl+f is not the issue, it is the fact that these republican representatives are controlling the information that our children receive in their education, promoting a white ethnocentric system of learning. Can you spell F-A-S-C-I-S-T  M-O-T-H-E-R-F-U-C-K-E-R-S? I sure can.



The Real Goal of Ariz.’s Book Banning Thought Police: Harass Latinos – COLORLINES.

Fox Regularly Uses The “Racial Code Words” Denounced By Fox’s Juan Williams

Fox News contributor Juan Williams recently wrote that “[t]he language of GOP racial politics is heavy on euphemisms that allow the speaker to deny any responsibility for the racial content of his message,” citing such phrases as “entitlement society,” “food stamp president,” and “amnesty” for undocumented immigrants. But this language is not contained to GOP candidates; Williams’ colleagues at Fox News routinely employ or echo these “racial code words.”